I love English accents. I wish I had one... although then I wouldn't be able to appreciate its beauty and would probably wish I had a different one. Anyway, I guess there are a few different versions; there's the Cockney accent and the Kentish/London/Queens English accent. My favorite is the latter and that is the one of which this post is about.

That accent reminds of classiness, dignity, sophistication, and perfection. Why does it remind of this? Because. Is my love-affair with this English accent rational? Nope. Do I still wish I spoke with one? Absolutely.



I practice my English accent at least once a week, and the week that I spent in England a few years ago was like a dream. It was like I was floating on clouds of beautiful accents. That being said, I would love to live in England... perhaps study in Cambridge. The University of Cambridge is the most beautiful school I've ever seen (see above and below). There's so much history and tradition there since it's been around for almost 800 years. It was founded in 1209. 1209! That's unbelievable.



Back to English accents... if you're a Jewish, modern orthodox girl, and have an English accent, then e-mail me and we'll get married. Okay?

I hope that in heaven, along with a massive supply of kosher bacon, everyone has English accents.


Twitter Digg StumbleUpon Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Reddit Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Del.icio.us RSS


Leave a Comment!...1 comments »

Goodbye Sophia.

Thursday, July 24, 2008 | | 0 comments »

Tuesday was a sad day, indeed. Estelle Getty, who played Sophia on The Golden Girls, passed away at 84. The Golden Girls was, and will always be, one of the greatest shows of all-time, and in no small part thanks to Estelle Getty.

Man, she was a funny lady.


Twitter Digg StumbleUpon Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Reddit Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Del.icio.us RSS


Leave a Comment!... 0 comments »

Sooooooo. Time travel? Possible? Maybe. According to Stephen Hawking, in his book A Brief History of Time and the introduction he wrote to Physics of Star Trek, "time traveling may be within out capabilities" and "its possibility remains open" because any sort of space travel that requires faster-than-light speed automatically means that you would be going back in time.

The picture above and to the left is a classic piece of cinematic Americana. The first reader to correctly identify it will win $1,000.*


This following text I copied right out of The Bible Code (194):

"The collision of comet Shoemaker-Levy with Jupiter starting on July 16, 1994, was observed by astronomers around the world, and reported in the international media. The details reported are from a series of stories in the New York Times, and the May 23, 1994, issue of Time magazine."
Amazing...

My only question is, how could the astronomers have seen the collision before it occurred if light is required to see everything, especially at such a distance. I understand the comet was traveling fast enough to travel backward in time, but how could the collision be seen before the light and explosion from it reached the astronomers' telescopes? Wouldn't it have taken the speed of light? Unless the comet was traveling so fast that the impact and its consequent explosion of light occurred so far in the past that even only traveling at the speed of light, the light from the collision was still able to reach the telescopes before the impact had actually occurred. I think that's what happened.

Woah. That got the old brain working a little bit. I'm glad I figured that out. It's been bothering me for a couple days.


P.S. I haven't read Stephen Hawking's books, but I did read a book called
The Bible Code, which is where I learned this information.

*To be given out in installments of $0, 0 times, never... or always, whatever the winner prefers.


Twitter Digg StumbleUpon Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Reddit Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Del.icio.us RSS


Leave a Comment!... 0 comments »